Citizens unfairly stripped of citizenship

By Adrian Roos MP (DA Deputy Shadow Minister of Home Affairs) and Dr Rory Jubber (DA Abroad Leader)

The DA yesterday presented its arguments to the High Court on behalf of thousands of South Africans who lost their citizenship without their knowledge.

The DA is taking the Department of Home Affairs to court to challenge Section 6(1)(a) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 (the Act) which we deem to be unconstitutional.

The application of this section sees South Africans who apply for a second nationality automatically lose their South African citizenship unless they actively retain their citizenship through successfully applying to the Minister of Home Affairs for a ‘retention of citizenship’.

Home Affairs claims this loss of citizenship is being done by personal choice whereas many South Africans lose their citizenship without even knowing it.

Almost 2 million South Africans currently live abroad, with thousands potentially affected by this arcane law.

The DA believes that Section 6(1)(a) of the Act is inconsistent with the Constitution, and with section 20 of the Constitution in particular, which states that “No citizen may be deprived of citizenship”.  Not only does Section 6(1)(a) unreasonably violate this right by depriving citizens of citizenship, but it does so without even affording them any notice.

For these reasons, the DA has the launched the necessary legal action, which will not only strike down Section 6(1)(a) but will also establish a means for former citizens to reclaim their South African citizenship.

The DA submitted its heads of argument to the High Court in late 2020, arguing that:

Section 6(1)(a) of the Act is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid;
All persons who had lost their South African citizenship in terms of Section 6(1)(a) of the Act on or after 6 October 1995 are South African citizens; and
That all persons referred to above may apply to the Minister in terms of Section 15 of the Act for the appropriate certificate of citizenship.
The ‘retention of citizenship’ service remains closed even under lockdown level 1 despite the DA informing the Minister that citizens will be denied their constitutional right to citizenship and requesting that the service be urgently reopened.

The court has reserved judgment on the matter and the DA is confident that these citizens who have been unfairly deprived of their citizenship will soon receive justice.

human and civil rights